<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Agit-Blog &#187; debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agit-pop.com/blog/tag/debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.agit-pop.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Health Care Debate and Bogging Down the Public Option</title>
		<link>http://www.agit-pop.com/blog/2009/08/17/health-care-bogging-down-public-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.agit-pop.com/blog/2009/08/17/health-care-bogging-down-public-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astroturf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agit-pop.com/blog/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the defenders of a public option, things are looking pretty grim.  Slim progress has been made in winning over Dems-on-the-take of the health care industry. Mostly this has to do with the comandeering of the news cycle undertaken by right-y astroturf groups.
The Town Hall takeovers and Teaparty nonsense transformed the campaign for health care [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the defenders of a public option, things are looking pretty grim.  <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/08/life-after-death-of-public-option.html" target="_blank">Slim progress has been made</a> in winning over Dems-on-the-take of the health care industry. Mostly this has to do with the comandeering of the news cycle undertaken by right-y astroturf groups.</p>
<p>The Town Hall takeovers and Teaparty nonsense transformed the campaign for health care reform into a debate about a debate, rather than a discussion about how to care for sick folks.  <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2009/08/14/inglewood/index.html" target="_blank">Joan Walsh draws out the contrast pretty well</a>: the debate at town halls has become more media friendly than the actual people who need health care.</p>
<p>For years, the Republicans kept a stranglehold on the national debate by effectively mobilizing values-laden language to frame how issues like health care were discussed.  Pro-public option folks had the opportunity to do the same thing by using the dramatic stories of Americans denied health care by for-profit insurers to force free marketeers to account for the damage wrought by a mainly private health care system.</p>
<p>Instead, the discussion got (intentionally) bogged down in a back and forth about &#8216;moving too fast&#8217;, &#8216;astro-turf&#8217; and the disingenuousness of right wing claims about death-panels and the like.</p>
<p>The lesson?  Keep you eye on the ball, and you&#8217;ve more likely to hit a home-run.  Get distracted, and you&#8217;ll strike out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.agit-pop.com/blog/2009/08/17/health-care-bogging-down-public-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
